Staying with echo chambers: 1. If their existence depends on the definition used, then the societal effect can’t be that large 2. How does “soc media maximizes engagement” support the echo chambers claim??? This very thread shows engagement goes up when exposed to different views
-
-
Replying to @kromitche @DegenRolf
So, in terms of your example, someone wrote an article showing “there is no miasma”, and you are throwing random objections at it because “tuberculosis is a problem”???
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kromitche @petark
Among many relevant empirical findings: Polarization is greatest among those the least likely to use the internet. People are more likely to communicate with like-minded others in face to face communication than online. The linked text is a thorough review of masses of research.
0 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @kromitche @petark
I take issue with people in the media who never took a look at any research finding condescendingly lamenting over people stuck in echo chambers. The dumb people, they mean.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
You mentioned Twitter. Here are just a few studies refuting the Twitter Echo Chamber concept. https://twitter.com/DegenRolf/status/1114058925119291392 …
pic.twitter.com/AusGtswcCZ
pic.twitter.com/qoJD1xZi7d
And look up
@DegenRolf AND echo chambers on Twitter search. I have posted masses of empirical refutations.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.