Every time feminists analyze a subject such as this, they find a way to manufacture surface validity while employing a formula that manipulates the outcome. It's like "women get paid 20% less for the same job". Sounds credible, but isn't. Always be wary of activist research.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Confounding.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 2 more replies
-
-
-
‘Most women who have reached leading positions and notable achievements in various social and occupational fields tend to attract greater public interest when compared to men who have reached similar succes’. Seems to undermine their conclusion a bit...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I have a question, Rolf. What do you say to studies that find sociology the softest of the soft sciences, stuffed to the gills with non-replicable studies that seem to exist only to confirm the biases of the researchers?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Maybe there's some subconscious bias at play
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.