That's amazing! Thanks for sharing... For the sake of clarity, psyarxiv means no peer review or am I confusing ideas,?
-
-
-
Yes, but since the onset of the reproducibility crisis, it has become clear that peer review is not the arbiter of scientific reliability. Preprints posted publicly and post peer review, interested parties debating papers, criticizing and leaving insights are the thing to go.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Are there some fMRI studies?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Dammit I need an excuse for my personal failings!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.