Wrong. The group is intelligent and NOT superstitious. That is the overall result, as shown in the Table. Given that finding of a main effect, the range restriction is clear, and other measures or correlations of secondary interest.
-
New conversation
-
-
-
159 University Students? Restriction of range seems likely, if that institution has any entrance standards.
-
Yeah, that sounds an incredibly biased sample to begin with. Both in terms of intelligence and in terms of cultural background.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Raven's Matrices I think mostly draws on fluid reasoning, so I wonder how a fuller IQ score with verbal reasoning and/or crystallized intelligence might impact the results.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Intelligence vs. IQ
Explicit, analytical rationality vs. implicit, intuitive rationality
rationality by method vs. rationality by outcome
...some thoughts. -
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
The participants in the study were all university students. That’s tremendous sample bias.
-
I've sampled my relatives. Wide variety of ages, and some variety of backgrounds. I'd call it confirming evidence.
You can be really smart, and have in-depth knowledge on a subject. Even if the subject is a huge mess of fabrication, fiction, and lies. - 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.