This retraction reminds of a (also retracted) paper by a Bangladesh professor, disproving evolution, who, with incredible chutzpah, had hijacked a renowned senior US entomologist – who had no clue of the coup – as an imaginary co-author. https://retractionwatch.com/2014/03/24/entomologist-surprised-to-find-name-on-now-retracted-paper-alleging-fossils-oppose-darwins-theory-of-evolution/ …
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Beer review? That sounds like fun.
-
Sounds appropriate in this case

- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Please don't say "thought provoking" unless you mean it. Wasted my time.
-
Come on, I was being ironic. It is creationist crap and provokes thoughts about "what were the reviewers thinking?"
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
There’s no way that was peer-reviewed and recommended for publication by specialists in human evolution.
-
Was beer review process flawed due to drunken academics?
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
That's really hard to follow.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
The beer review better say Guiness is the best beer.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.