-
-
It also comports with the vast literature on salience.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Just to be clear: I am not a big fan of IAT (for other reasons) and also find the results in the 2012 paper plausible (short-term treatment effect of an uncomfortable prime). Just concerned not to exaggerate the substantive significance of the empirical finding.
-
He just quoted the text. I guess my "woops" counts as editorializing a teenie tiny bit
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Those are claims are not specifically about IAT results. I have read the new paper and the 2012 paper. The new paper is not about IAT: it is about the unintended effects of scientific communication.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.