"participants whose moral identities were situationally activated or chronically accessible" Hunh?
-
-
-
They measured "the extent to which being “moral” is believed to be particularly self-defining and central to one’s self-concept."
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Because human instincts are stronger than they are credited for. Humans know that we externally compensate for our shortcomings. So those who outwardly espouse high and rigid morality are always suspected of actually lacking it. They doth protest too much, methinks...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Well I am just shocked by this groundbreaking discovery.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Okay, so much for moralists. What about people who are moral?
-
Defining “moral” in this complex, imperfect world produces relative, subjective real-world results. Everyone does the “best” they can.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Remember Jorge of Burgos from The Name of the Rose? “The spirit is serene only when it contemplates the truth and takes delight in good achieved, and truth and good are not to be laughed at. That is why Christ did not laugh. Laughter foments doubt.”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I feel better about keeping my client's gift.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Feel bad liberalism
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That’s a great quote, surprised I’d never heard it before
End of conversation
New conversation
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.