I stopped reading after Senators were lumped into the same reference category as Fortune 500 CEOs.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
@nntaleb ( you missed an 'n' )
End of conversation
-
-
-
He said "the results tells us the variance of results increases" which is false, you cannot conclude that from data that shows the average outcome goes up significantly as IQ increases. Also, if the average is going up, his thesis that IQ has zero correlation after 100 is false.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They measured: Educational attainment Registering at least one patent Publishing at least one journal paper Earning income ≥95th %ile Earning tenure at a top-50 university http://bit.ly/2zV3hKg Of course not everyone aspires to these, but high IQ makes it easier when they do
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Give me an average, but very consistent, person over an intelligent yet inconsistent person any day. For most ‘jobs’ consistently will always win out.
-
Most 'jobs' are not meant to measure or to indicate extraordinary success.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
On a serious note , is there ANY way to compete with high Iq ppl? Or are we just DOOMED???
-
There are ways to compete with them on specific tasks.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Talebots always formulating the best arguments.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.