Those in favor of “downscal[ing] the human factor” should feel free to lead by example.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Nothing is stopping you from leaving.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
‘Science’ is running on fumes these days
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"Downscale the human factor", you say? I have a few friends who'd be willing to support this idea. They'll even tell you who should go first!
-
It's amazing how many people I have heard blithely regard the deaths of millions of people in famines and disasters as "natural". Sort of a casual eugenics.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I think she suffers from a Crist-complex. How is this "science"?pic.twitter.com/MSQ4EwnWOR
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Somewhere, Julian Simon is weeping.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is old news for people studying sustainability, demographics, environment, etc. The Science article just points out the need for change in values for it to happen. Your incredulity is an Argument From Personal Astonishment fallacy.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
