I thought higher male risk taking due to gamete abundance is a core idea of evopsyche.. seems like it would be a significant blow to the field if this were false?
Despite numerous reports to the contrary, sex hormones such as testosterone have no measurable effect on economic behavior and risk taking, suggesting there was something fishy about original results. https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781315200439-23 …pic.twitter.com/8u7Jy85BC1
-
-
-
That hypothesis would not necessarily imply that you can boost risk taking by giving people more T, also, T levels may well just be an accompanying symptom, rather than the cause of risk taking.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
When “science” agrees with progressive political views, it’s probably wrong.
-
Small c conservatism conserves ( sorta) traditional behaviors: if they have lasted a long time, they're probably at least moderately compatible with biological reality.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Were they taking sensitivity to testosterone into account? Test levels on their own don't give a full picture.
-
Once total T is at least about 500, free T becomes more important than raising total T even more. T to E ratio also a factor.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.