if you consider this to be one of the best replicated findings in psych you must have a really low opinion of the field
-
-
-
It already has a handful of successful replications with high numbers of participants. Given the trend from the reproducibility crisis in the field, this should count as high.
- 10 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Don’t believe the hype. This is a cross-cluster comparison with N = 22 countries… Basically, with such a small number of clusters, country effects are completely unreliable (especially to estimate the effect size).pic.twitter.com/xAFEBjMx5M
-
Did you see that one? (only one from several I posted)https://twitter.com/DegenRolf/status/1031854920956297216 …
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
C'mon, "aggravate"? ... "strengthen" or something less evaluative would've been nice...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Isn’t “aggravate” a loaded word? It implies sex differences are bad. Use “stimulate” or “activate” instead.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Interesting that the result had to be dressed up as 'surprising' and 'curious.'
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"Curious result". Hahahahahahahahah. Whew, I enjoyed that.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.