The fake orgasm book is still advertised uncritically at the Johns Hopkins University Press site. https://jhupbooks.press.jhu.edu/content/technology-orgasm … And look at the enthusiastic endorsements! I'd think a retraction is called for, to prevent further desinformation. cc @RetractionWatch
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
An anticlimactic conclusion
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is why I want to know who did research and the particulars. Sloppy is one thing but there is a lot of deceit in the field as certain "researchers" seek to impose their normative beliefs on others without regard to data or what the data shows, however unpalatable it may be.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Victorianists and historians of sexuality suspected this was bullsh*t--but nobody was willing to do the digging through the notes and it got embedded in the modestly-educated population's stock of "everyone knows" factoids fairly quickly.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What the hell? Why do people not care to fact-check?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Academia lost their credibility (outside of academia and the MSM) long ago.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.