r=?
-
-
-
. r~0.25
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It takes a lot more mental effort to weigh trade-offs, account for confounding variables that distort the true effects of any given policy, understand that wealth can be *generated* and not just shuffled around, etc. Case in point - minimum wage impact:https://github.com/analyticascent/confounder/blob/master/criteria/minwage.md …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What are they defining as economic conservatism? Seems obvious the most radical (anti-conservative) economic driving force in today's world is the global experiment with porous borders, since it will lead to societal fracturing, chaos and tyranny, but many call it 'conservative.'
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Fairly right to notice whether such conservatism indicators are socially and politically conditioned in terms of grades in the ideological spectrum.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Regardless of how people rationalise (or intellectualise) their political beliefs, the optimal policies always seem to support their own interests.
-
If this is not the case, they are accused of champagne socialism!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 1 more reply
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.