Maybe a good one for @DegenRolfhttps://twitter.com/jongrahe/status/1013121809267527680 …
-
-
Replying to @hansijzerman
Thanks for the nice tip, but in my view, red is dead, and you don't beat a dead horse.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DegenRolf
This paper was first submitted long time before red was dead, original author criticized it for being student replications and got rejected.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @hansijzerman
Thanks, I'll look into it. Right now I am flabbergasted by Lee Jussi's revelations about the recent Gilbert paper in "Science".
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DegenRolf
Which revelations? It not being very generalizable?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @hansijzerman
Rolf Degen Retweeted Lee Jussim
That one, the subtweets and other stuff at his site:https://twitter.com/PsychRabble/status/1013239608153272320 …
Rolf Degen added,
Lee Jussim @PsychRabbleEarlier today, I tweeted about a paper that just came out in Science, raising questions about ... many aspects of it. The original tweet is here; and is followed by an interesting convo, w/branches; some pushing back; pushback on the pushback, etc: https://twitter.com/PsychRabble/status/1013074723490562048 … ThreadShow this thread1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DegenRolf
Power was def enough, but they should have done prereg, and he’s right about conclusions being totally overblown. Plus, would it have been published if authors were, say, in China and would have stated same conclusions?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
The fact that not even "Science" has learned some lessons from the crisis suggest it is even worse than thought.
-
-
Replying to @DegenRolf
My strong sense is that this will change pretty soon.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.