Women who wore an obese body suit, which creates the psychosocial experience of feeling overweight, consumed more snack foods. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195666317313041 …pic.twitter.com/tGQVSJxwLo
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
This may be unreasonable in our media environment, but if you need more time to be sure a paper you want to report on is decent, then you need to take that time - post less, but post higher quality. It's your responsibility, not just that of journals.
Absolutely not. If I find interesting or provoking stuff, I bring it up here to the expert community, who often give sound and critical comments. Nobody ALONE can completely appreciate soundness and this has already led to some very important discoveries.
If science writers adopted certain simple heuristics, I think the quality of their output would greatly improve. For example, if an experiment has fewer than 100 people per condition, don't write about, FORGET IT.
Why should I be subjected to harsher criteria than the high impact journals? If I follow your reasoning, I can stop reporting about all cognitive neuroscience, and most other stuff.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.