It's been a while since I found myself disagreeing so strongly with a piece on agriculture.https://twitter.com/gmdutfield/status/1149264579177963520 …
-
-
But are the small-scale, traditional approaches more sustainable? Yes, perhaps, if you compare environmental impacts *per unit of land*. But the point of farming is to produce food. Environmental impacts *per unit of food* typically look very different.
Show this thread -
For example, here are greenhouse gas emissions from beef expressed *per kg of protein*. By far the highest emissions intensity is found in ... traditional systems, where productivity is low.pic.twitter.com/s2sQx04pLh
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I'm a little confused by this chart. When it says "small," it means less than 2 hectares (about 5 acres)? That sounds more like a large garden, from a US perspective at least.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Consolidation has been going on since the early 70s.
-
I'm sorry. I meant that as a question. But as far as impact goes, the effect of conservation and Ag agents is important as well as whether it uses "organic" or old fashioned tillage as opposed to modern. Modern methods sequester carbon. Traditional tillage releases it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.