Can someone who understands men’s clothing explain why Keir Starmer’s suits always look like he’s on work experience despite the fact he goes to a tailor. Is this a style choice, what’s going on.https://twitter.com/PA/status/1384145086875803651 …
Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
I often think this. With Trump it was about hiding obesity, but god knows what’s happening here. So weird.
Right? And it presumably costs a fair whack, so I have no idea why you wouldn’t just say “no, this doesn’t fit, try again, alter it.”
It's people thinking that massive tent-like clothes that hide everything must be more flattering, so that's what they ask for. But I'm surprised the tailors let them get away with it - it's not very good advertising for them!
The client.
Bloody Corbyn innit.
I've heard that there is a way for old money to distinguish themselves from new money - "newly" wealthy wear fitted new suits while old money inherited their well-kept suits from their fathers. Could it be something like this?
Apparently JRM explicitly asks his tailor to make them look like this is what’s happened – even tho they’re new suits
I think the answer is that their tailors hate them.
It’s not the clothes, the problem lies with the shape of British men who are usually a bit portly and often a strange shape. Now take a Frenchman, he would look good in a paper bag!
This Frenchman? (NB, this is coming from an Englishman with a few extra COVID kilos these days)pic.twitter.com/I27ZcP35o4
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.