It absolutely does not. Even with any safeguards they may put in place, people will very quickly figure out how to abuse it.https://twitter.com/Iron_Spike/status/1354059035327213569 …
-
-
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @alexvtunzelmann
I am endlessly annoyed that people who cannot be bothered to proof read tweets think them having to delete and repost is such a struggle that an edit function that will instantly be misused in absolutely appalling ways is a necessity.
4 vastausta 8 uudelleentwiittausta 38 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @DawnHFoster
It would make this website totally unusable for conversation. Far too high risk. Realistically, we’d probably all have to delete all our old interactions too, because otherwise monitoring them for malicious changes would be a full time job.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 7 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @alexvtunzelmann
“Is anyone a fan of cake?” turned into “Does anyone support the policies and methods of the Nazi Party?” instantly.
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 7 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @DawnHFoster ja @alexvtunzelmann
people love to counter this with stuff like "but make edit histories visible!" like, Wikipedia pages have full edit histories; but the stuff currently live in the article reaches that many more people
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 2 tykkäystä
I always find that baffling - incredibly complex, unwieldy remedies to a huge glaring problem, when they could simply proof read, or live with errors/delete and repost like we all do. Why scream for such a complicated unnecessary update?
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
msdawnfoster@gmail.com Tusk is the best Fleetwood Mac album. Only care about LFC.