critics of private pharmaceutical companies are so obviously not objecting to the production of vaccines in and of themselves, and anyone advancing any line implying that they are is either totally fucking dense, or else feigning this denseness for more sinister reasons
-
-
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @tristandross
Always enjoy reading about meds I’ve been prescribed and do often there’s a section (eg with pregabalin) where big pharma are pushing it for all manner of ailments while claiming it’s totally harmless. Whereas now it’s a controlled drug as of last year.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 6 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @DawnHFoster ja @tristandross
A lot of the “controlled drugs” are given that title as a way to charge for them. Prior to that designation, they were totally free on the nhs.
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä
You honestly have no idea what you are talking about. Pregabalin’s prescribed for seizures and epileptics don’t pay for prescriptions. Pfizer lost the court battle for a second Lyrica patent before it was controlled. It’s now cheaper for the NHS.
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
msdawnfoster@gmail.com Tusk is the best Fleetwood Mac album. Only care about LFC.