-
-
-
Replying to @PocketLint11
Oh, no credit to me - loads of people were speaking up & were unsatisfied with the initial explanation!
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @alexvtunzelmann @PocketLint11
Yours was the first tweet I saw raising it. Credit also to all those who were able to point out some of the more obscure tats and their significance, and
@DawnHFoster who established that the story about his father dying in ‘88 was highly questionable1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Yes, I wonder if that’s what made them change direction? I suppose there might still be an explanation, but at the very least they do need to investigate properly.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Yeah, they were clearly sticking very closely to that line, copying and pasting it to everyone and it just instantly *stopped* the second I asked them about the electoral roll. But we should be told what research they did before, why no one checked his dad story & why they asked
2 replies 0 retweets 18 likes
It *looks* as if they contacted him to ask about the 88 only after people tweeted about it, as they had no excuses for the other tattoos. So why aren’t they researching people properly, and why - presumably - have people in production been ignored when raising concerns?
-
-
Replying to @DawnHFoster @alexvtunzelmann and
This seems by far the most likely explanation.
0 replies 0 retweets 3 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
msdawnfoster@gmail.com Tusk is the best Fleetwood Mac album. Only care about LFC.