“His use of the flat above number 11 is taxed as a benefit in kind” because..... it is exactly that. Should we really be trusting the economy to a man who didn’t do back-of-fag-packet calculations about the job he had apparently dreamed of since he was a small child?
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
AND he has to pay tax on the rent he's not paying
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It’s a wonder he can manage to feed his 6 or 7 kids tbh
-
The article says he’s only part-supporting 4/6
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
My heart bleeds for the unfortunate soul.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
*plays world’s smallest violin*
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sad really.. Hope he is a prompt player..
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thoughts and prayers
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yup, he has his own kitchen in his flat. And he has to pay for food from his office canteen. Outrageous.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This isn't unusual, of course. Politicians, especially those in government, spend so much time hobnobbing with and sucking up to the super rich (especially natural if one comes from a very privileged background), that they genuinely feel hard done by. Sick, but there it is.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
msdawnfoster@gmail.com Tusk is the best Fleetwood Mac album. Only care about LFC.