Don't think books involving Holocaust denialism should be "read to understand prejudice" when historically accurate books on the Holocaust are powerful and instructive enough on prejudice by themselves - and it's telling some people even approve of a both-sides counter-narrative.
-
-
This is my other issue with it beyond the uneasy ethics - we can only read so many books a year, why would you waste a week or two hatereading some craven, irredeemable monster's gibberish about why objective history is actually a lie lol.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
msdawnfoster@gmail.com Tusk is the best Fleetwood Mac album. Only care about LFC.