Who is worse - snitchtaggers (https://mashable.com/article/snitch-tagging/ …), or men who, when you state something is patronising, reply with precisely that but ~ironically<
-
-
Snitch tagging. Always snitch tagging. If I wanted to directly debate said person I’d QT, let me snark in peace damnit.
-
Also often you want to talk about their general point, not debate it with them ffs
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Both are awful, but I think the snitch-taggers probably have the worse effect on the website.
-
Though obviously I experience very little of the extremely funny ironically abusive repliers, so it could just be that I don’t feel it in the same way, whereas snitch tagging seems to happen to everyone with a few followers, regardless of gender.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Interesting. I'm from the "never at anything about someone behind their back that you wouldn't say to their face" school, so I don't mind snitch tagging.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
msdawnfoster@gmail.com Tusk is the best Fleetwood Mac album. Only care about LFC.