People have said this endlessly, but it still happens daily: don’t @ people in when another person hasn’t. I don’t need to be notified whenever someone is critical of my work or to fight them for your entertainment. It’s a rude form of snitching and I block anyone who does it.
-
-
Emotional intelligence =
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
it's fine if it's something they'll appreciate in a positive way - but if someone is being critical of someone else, then tagging the latter to cause drama with the former is annoying.
- Show replies
-
-
-
They do it because men are messy bitches who live for drama.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
aka "snitch tag" https://twitter.com/peg_mclaugh/status/1065418835342385152 …
This Tweet is unavailable. -
I was guilty of this once or twice when I first joined twitter, especially with tweets I thought had strong, well-developed arguments on a particular position. Thankfully I realised why it's a bad idea pretty quickly!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
They're the same people who, at school, without fail always snitched on you to the person you'd been talking about. "Oooh, X said this!" I always block them. There's no need for it - if I'd wanted to tag them into it, I'd do it myself!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It’s grotesque. Horrible attention seeking, using another person as a springboard.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sexist (awaits block).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
msdawnfoster@gmail.com Tusk is the best Fleetwood Mac album. Only care about LFC.