When the Jenkins Story came out in the .@sfchronicle I had assumed that .@hknightsf just didn't get the other side of the story.
But after receiving this article from the defense attorney in the Gudino case the problem goes a lot deeperhttps://www.davisvanguard.org/2021/10/guest-commentary-public-defender-sets-record-straight-on-knight-column-and-gudino-case/ …
-
-
The public defender writes: " Knight also ignores that Jenkins acted against the wishes of the family, and against the findings of medical experts. As I also informed Knight, Jenkins’ contrary arguments during the two phases arguably constituted prosecutorial misconduct..."
Show this thread -
"I am investigating whether a state bar complaint is warranted."
Show this thread -
A key point that gets lost in all of this - there are two sides to every story. I'm not posting this because I believe that the Public Defender in this case was right and Jenkins was wrong.
Show this thread -
Instead, what I'm saying is that .
@hknightsf had an obligation to publish both sides here and apparently did not. She has an axe to grind when she should be obligated to report the truth.Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.