Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
So true. On the very rare occasion when I beat Peter Thiel at chess, he would smash all the pieces. When I called him a sore loser, he responded “show me a good loser and I’ll show you a loser.” Show me a founder who thinks it’s ok to fail fast and I’ll show you a failure.https://twitter.com/andrew__reed/status/1247989369241079809 …
The point is that being a founder is so hard that as soon as you accept failure as acceptable, you’re more likely to succumb to it. Of course we all know failure is a possibility. But it’s better to act as if it’s not — to burn the boats, psychologically speaking.
The “fast” part is also wrong insofar as when things aren’t working, you want to give yourself as much time as possible. I hear too many excuses for why burn can’t be cut. As long as you have runway, you have life and the chance for success. Give yourself the chance.
Smash all the pieces?! That sounds reckless lol
What was Peters preferred opener?
Isnt the point fail quickly and iterate often? Rather than try to salvage something that isn't working by brute forcing it, just make substantial changes or completely pivot
Recklessness never led to a sustainable solution. Funding, yes. A sustainable future, no. Rapid iteration doesn't build loyalty or a fan base either. You know what happens to people who rapidly pivot? They bury themselves. You can't brute force a market but you can plan...
You beat Peter at chess?
Seen the opposite as well: being called a bad winner. 
Fail fast is an exit scam.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
