It's important to note that the percentage of viruses killed is proportional to the amount of light and exposure time (a bit like soap). Unlike soap you can expose large areas to large amounts of light for long periods without interrupting normal activity.
-
-
Näytä tämä ketjuKiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
This is amazing. Why aren't more people talking about this?
-
I think this about almost every one of his tweets.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
That’s amazing. Do you know of any synthetic fiber that can kill virus by messing with it’s outer oil layer / membrane?
-
Nope. Don't know much about synthetic fibers. Sorry!
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Sounds like great solution to temporary sterilize public places like hospitals and train stations. At the same time this will also kill a lot of harmless, good, sometimes essential bacteria (?)
-
If we're worried about good bacteria we could limit it to high risk zones like transit and hospitals and only during flu seasons or a pandemic. I'd love to know more about disadvantages of killing too much bacteria in a human environment.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
What's the rate at which it mutates bacterial DNA at the same time? (If any)
-
Doesn't mutate, just kills by breaking down the DNA or RNA entirely.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Great article! Answered a lot of my questions. Amazingly detailed benchmark. I'm wondering about the attenuation of light from a source deployed in a typical environment? How much attenuation per unit of distance, how does humidity affect the passage of this light, etc. ? ?
-
My impression is that it'll go pretty far, the main reason why we don't get this wavelength from space is the ozone layer I think.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.