The entire problem with you and your ilk,those who justify every unnecessary massacre, those who place Israel above international law and rules of engagement, see this unilateral vacation of an occupied territory as a favour to the population indigenous to that territory.
-
-
-
Both sides should be held to account. Often only one side is.
-
And how do you hold them to account when you deny them nation-state status? The traditional ways of sanctioning deviant behaviour from established international law and norms becomes problematic in application.
-
The PLA/Hamas have turned down multiple opportunities. Recognize Israel's right to exist a majority Jewish state and give up right of return & there's a deal to be had on negotiated borders. Until those two things happen, there will not be any deal.
-
You betray the virtue of objectivity by only apportioning blame to one side. The fact that the Palestinians live in a perpetual state of a humanitarian crises is not enough punishment? And yes there has been punishment meted out to previous Hamas activities.
-
I apportion blame to each side when it's deserved. I think it's been too one sided in the other direction.
-
Is it too much to expect the more powerful, way more, to exhibit a greater sense of morality in prosecution of war and conflict.
-
Putting aside your argument who has exercised more morality in this conflict, I think you hit an important point. In fact, I think both should be held to the same standards, vs. putting more on Israel because they are more powerful.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Should raze Gaza to rubble. Muslim invaders can't get away with their BS there like they do against Europe or the U.S. It's a pleasure seeing the good guys crush the bad guys
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.