We're gonna all spend a ;lot of time wondering about this and I'm gonna be especially curious about the Denver possibility, but remember: Where parties hold their conventions means nothing in electionshttps://twitter.com/aseitzwald/status/994325520224538625 …
-
-
Yeah, I don't entirely agree with Nick on the underlying points. It often telegraphs what the parties think the strategy for the fall will be.
-
I think this is true sometimes but not others. How did Philadelphia, for example, telegraph HRC's strategy? Fingers crossed for Milwaukee, it's one of the better summertime options.
-
Milwaukee would be cool but does it have enough hotel/airport capacity? Feel like it might become a de facto Milwaukee-slash-northern-suburbs-of-Chicago convention.
-
That's sort of why I think Birmingham is the worst of the bunch. Some nice hotels, but I can easily see myself winding up in a Holiday Inn in Sylacauga because I booked late.
-
All of them seem like logistical nightmares of one kind or another except maybe Denver: Traffic hell: ATL, MIA, SF Security hell: NYC Hot as hell: HOU, BIR, ATL Hurricane risk: MIA, HOU Not enough hotels: MIL, BIR Small/shitty airports: MIL, BIR, MIA Expensive as hell: NYC, SF
-
David gets it. Vegas is the best convention city in America. And you can cross off all of
@NateSilver538's objections except for "hot as hell." But once you are inside The Venetian or Aria, no need to go outside. - 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.