Just what we all need, another journalist bemoaning a completely benign effort by a woman leader to remain involved in her life's work and insinuate it will lead to something negative =>https://twitter.com/DavidMDrucker/status/971472527343214595 …
-
-
You're absolutely right. She's the one the media build a machine around to act outraged about everything she does. You didn't even feel the need to provide a reason why this was bad. You don't see the problem with a journalist doing this?
-
She's held to a higher standard than every single other living politician simply because of manufactured scandals are consistently justified *exactly this way,* based on her prior history of bogus scandals! Y'all are so bent about her it's amazing.
-
I'm not bent out of shape. Just observing. Some of her scandals are real, some are not.
-
Serious question: what is this difference, in your opinion, between a journalist opining based on his own biases and one that is "just observing"?
-
I don't just report, I offer analysis. That analysis is subjective but it's not the same as opining. fwiw
-
Yes. Analysis is based on data rather than personal feelings. Hard to see your tweet as meaningful analysis. It was quite clearly opining based on a personal view that is shaped in large part by your overzealous outrage over everything she does.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.