@DavidMDrucker David - Beverly Nelson just admitted on camera that she forged part of the yearbook in regards to Moore. She's a liar. Do you have any comment? It is morally cruel to indict an innocent man. It is not a crime for a 30 year old to date 17 year old girls (SEINFELD).
I answered them. You don't like my answers. There's no proof that the yearbook inscription signed by Moore, in different handwriting than the location & date underneath, is a forgery. Senate Ethics could get to bottom.
-
-
If someone lies about a major detail, they don't get the benefit of the doubt. She also has a motive. He ruled against her in the divorce hearing. This to me is stunning. SHE LIED. Her credibility is ZERO.
-
My argument is not that you are absolutely not correct, just that I still think there is credibility to the accusations & problems w/ his inconsistent defense. Not much more I can say on this.
-
Last thing I'll say: No credibility to accusations. Press conflating perfectly legal with 2 accusers to make it seem a habit. Moore is being railroaded. It's not fair and it'd disgusting on part of media, GOPe and Dems
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You didn't answer on Corfman! Her story is full of holes. This the worst political hit job I have ever seen....Moore is not to be grouped with pervs like Franken or Franks or criminals like Conyers. Moore is a good man
-
I don't think her story is full of holes. I think you're finding holes because he don't believe her and trust Moore.
-
1) She was 'bad' at 14, meaning sexually active. But her Mom left her with a strange man. In 1970's Alabama? 2) She had 10 days (maximum, could have gone immediately) to get to Dad. When did she have time to date Moore? Answer: She didn't
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.