@DavidMDrucker David - Beverly Nelson just admitted on camera that she forged part of the yearbook in regards to Moore. She's a liar. Do you have any comment? It is morally cruel to indict an innocent man. It is not a crime for a 30 year old to date 17 year old girls (SEINFELD).
Her credibility just took a huge hit. But that doesn't mean her entire story is definitely bunk. Plus, doesn't mean every other story, Corfman, etc, is bunk. There credibility hasn't suffered a similar blow. Plus Moore's defense has still been all over the place and queastionable
-
-
Her story is bunk. She has a motive. Moore ruled against her. She's a liar. You don't get to lie about someone like that. She 'added context.' Give me a break.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ask yourself this on Corfman: 1) When they say a 14-yr old girl is 'bad' that usually means sexually active. Yet the mom would leave her with a strange man? 2) Divorce hearing was agreed upon. Would have taken 2 mins. Why would she wait outside? 3) She had 10 days to get to Dad
-
And she may have gone to Dad immediately. There was no time to date Moore. Most of those days were school days. Almost impossible. Plus, too many things about her story don't add up, like the corner he picked her up 1 mile from house
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What almost certainly happened was that Moore liked dating younger girls. Nothing wrong with that. Totally legal. Not outside of societal norms, especially in 1970's Alabama. In your heart, you must know it
-
If the story was that he dated 17/18/19 year-olds, this would have been a nuisance story. Corfman was 14. The other claims assault, others claim a lot of pestering. It goes against his conservative image on top of it all. Disagree.
-
'The other claims assault.' She was just proven a liar. You can't act like this didn't just happen. 'Pestering?!?!' Give me a break. Being persistent to go on dates with girls. This is a joke. That leaves Corfman. You cannot answer any of the questions I just brought up.
-
I answered them. You don't like my answers. There's no proof that the yearbook inscription signed by Moore, in different handwriting than the location & date underneath, is a forgery. Senate Ethics could get to bottom.
-
If someone lies about a major detail, they don't get the benefit of the doubt. She also has a motive. He ruled against her in the divorce hearing. This to me is stunning. SHE LIED. Her credibility is ZERO.
-
My argument is not that you are absolutely not correct, just that I still think there is credibility to the accusations & problems w/ his inconsistent defense. Not much more I can say on this.
-
Last thing I'll say: No credibility to accusations. Press conflating perfectly legal with 2 accusers to make it seem a habit. Moore is being railroaded. It's not fair and it'd disgusting on part of media, GOPe and Dems
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
How can you say 'that doesn't mean her entire story is definitely bunk.' Ummm, yes it does. She's a liar. You don't get to lie on a big thing from 40 years ago and then have people believe you. Allred must be disbarred. She pulled this same stuff with Trump. She's horrible
-
1) If the divorce was agreed on, it would have taken 2 minutes. Why would she have had to wait outside the court room? 2) She had 10 days to get to Dad after hearing. How could she have time to date Moore? 3) The corner where she claims he picked her up was 1 mile from her house
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.