How do the Democrats plan to respond to the GOP's embrace of @MooreSenate? @ThePlumLineGS has details:http://wapo.st/2kn3UHe
I'm not sure it's a matter of high and mighty, just understand where your logic leads. NOTHING means NOTHING, unless you're assuming only flaws you can live with.
-
-
I will not destroy my country over allegations that I am not sure I trust anyway. Country is first for me. Our country is better off with Moore than that idiot Jones. The rest of it is moral relativity and, IMO, crap. No choice means no choice.
-
Fair enough. I get that. But that's not what you said. You said nothing. So under that logic, malfeasance you knew to be true (ie. murder? treason? - I'm purposely making up something horrible to make a point) wouldn't matter because Dem?
-
Well, I knew those things to be true about Hillary, which is why I was literally shaking on Election Day, terrified she would win. I doubt I would vote for ANY traitor to America or murderer. Moore is neither.
-
OK, so then your "nothing" rule should be revised or clarified, which I think makes more sense. Hard to tell these days.
-
Got it, thanks.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.