This attorney's lack of understanding of the term literally only compounds the ridiculous comparison of Lee to Washington.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Lee did opposite of Washington renting nation that George built asunder, even now not adequately merged Lee became a traitor on own volition
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Someone needs to read a freakin history book!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
An ironic difference is that Lee inherited by marriage Washington's slaves & freed them as executor of Mary Custis's father's estate in 1862
-
And one was a traitor, the other not. One was a general who won a war & became Pres, the other not.
-
Technically they both were traitors to the governing authority, only one won so he gets the glory, while the other lost and does not.
-
To gov authority yes, but not to America.
-
1/ The comparison goes back to the little kid behavior of getting called on something & saying "but what about him/her?" They don't really
-
2/ care about the diff. They just want ppl get sucked down a rabbit hole of trying to be logical w/the illogical. No matter your answer
-
3/ to Wash vs Lee, they'll come back w/well why does xyz get a pass? They have no legit argument so they play smart w/quests.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.