I agree. But journalists who leak info. that is classified (WH conversations w/leaders of foreign govs.) can become repugnant to consumers.
-
-
-
Of course. But we're generally quite responsible in dealing w/ that.
-
As are publishers/networks, who bear the brunt of consumer distaste for such behavior, seeing the objective as embarrassing an opponent.
-
No. Reporting news is the objective.
-
You are the exception. Private conversations between world leaders should stay private, for obvious reasons.
-
Agree, which is why I believe leaks should stop. Issue is who should get squeezed.
-
The leakers themselves, not journalists. However, publishers and networks control what goes out. They are a last stopgap on dangerous leaks.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You are above reproach !
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
what they like to do is bluster & emptily threaten journalists, which you're right doesn't work at all. jail time & fines prob would though
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But they will nevertheless.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
they've never really tried to get there by going after journalists. if, for argument's sake, they executed 25 or 30 of them, I bet it might
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.