Shouldn't we have some probable cause first, before investigating? There was for Whitewater, Fast and Furious, emailgate...
-
-
Replying to @nadinecarroll @greatwetshart
...that both sides tend to view this stuff the same. The other guy was clearly guilty, my guy clearly not. It's how everyone FEELS.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DavidMDrucker @greatwetshart
But your job is facts, not feels.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nadinecarroll @greatwetshart
In covering D.C., I report on and explain how officials in D.C. feel and what they think to explain their actions to voters.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DavidMDrucker @nadinecarroll
True, but one can't compare these things without historical context, seriousness of crime. & Repubs endlessly investigate...
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
But the defense is politically driven.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @greatwetshart @nadinecarroll
They deny he obstructed & colluded. But they don't deny that Trump associates might have done both.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DavidMDrucker @greatwetshart
But no leak of something real that looks bad, at a time when everything leaks? After a year? The natural conclusion is, they got nuthin'.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nadinecarroll @greatwetshart
You might be right but people disagree w/ you and that's not known as a universal standard.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DavidMDrucker @greatwetshart
Wut? How did a universal standard enter the picture?Thought we were talking about available evidence.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
We're talking past each other. I'm not necessarily saying you're wrong, just pointing out that many disagree w/ you - I tell them same often
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.