Others were convicted on Whitewater. So some crime existed. What statute would hypothetical collusion violate? Still no evidence, after a yr
-
-
Replying to @nadinecarroll @greatwetshart
And some crime might exist here, which we'll find out if the investigation plays out.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DavidMDrucker @greatwetshart
Shouldn't we have some probable cause first, before investigating? There was for Whitewater, Fast and Furious, emailgate...
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nadinecarroll @greatwetshart
...that both sides tend to view this stuff the same. The other guy was clearly guilty, my guy clearly not. It's how everyone FEELS.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DavidMDrucker @greatwetshart
But your job is facts, not feels.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nadinecarroll @greatwetshart
In covering D.C., I report on and explain how officials in D.C. feel and what they think to explain their actions to voters.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DavidMDrucker @nadinecarroll
True, but one can't compare these things without historical context, seriousness of crime. & Repubs endlessly investigate...
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @greatwetshart @DavidMDrucker
My point is that Repubs manage to get special counsels with no crime--none in Plamegate, Russia-collusion story is falling apart...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nadinecarroll @greatwetshart
On your first point I agree they seem to draw short end of stick, on 2nd, I don't think we can say yet that story falling apart.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DavidMDrucker @greatwetshart
I don't think it's bad luck. The rules are rigged. Media never howled for Holder or Lynch to recuse, and there was cause!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I wasn't using to imply bad luck just to say your observation was correct.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.