Why focus on presidential communications? Because Trump often undermines what could be broad support for his policies by what he says.
...Having said, there is lot of support for tighter vetting. But POTUS has undermined what could have been broad support by his words
-
-
What I'm saying is pundits perpetuate some CW among themselves which doesn't stand to test if ppl actually voted for on it
-
I agree w/ you that his happens a lot. I take on case by case basis.
-
I think
@gop keeps their majority. I'll only instigate & fund trouble makers vs them if they fail to pass any major legistn -
Don't disagree in the aggregate. Question for now is how many House seats do they lose.
-
We'll have to see
-
Yep... Keep bringing the heat (at me.)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You say he undermined, I say he didn't. Remember his "ban muslim" speech? MSM pundits screamed & polls showed otherwise
-
That was a GOP primary. Different universe if voters. Plus different responsibilities.
-
Well he hasn't hurt any special election. Infact the Ossof dude doesn't really want to make it ref on Trump. DNC pushing it
-
These have been solid R districts - not swing districts.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
But David, >90 days have passed since ban order was signed, & Trump just said we're extreme vetting NOW. So what is justification for ban?
-
They claimed they needed 90 days to study the problem. 90 days have passed. Vetting is now "extreme" per DJT. So what is reason for ban?pic.twitter.com/spqXtgWojb
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.