So I'm just supposed to give the anonymous sources at the NYT the benefit of doubt eh?
-
-
-
The White House didn't deny the report at all. Just complained about leaks.
-
Why should the White House have to disputed every insane accusation from the nyt? Anon. Sources from a biased newspaper seems flimsy to me
-
But not to many other people..WH, D or R, always disputes story if wrong. It just does. They don't selectively let false stories stand
-
While I wish trumps comma team was better and more reactive im not about to believe anonymous sources from a paper that literally hates him
-
They know it's true. Or they would say it's false because they would love to see the NYT embarrassed.
-
Average citizens that aren't apart of the beltway or newyork corridor is obvious. So why give weight to anonymous sources? Its dangerous
-
I get where you're coming from and I get why. Just explaining what I know/think & why.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
The president of the United States said this to two representatives from the country that hacked our election. Isn't that just great.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.