When it comes to WMD, "limited" isn't limited. Btw I'm not letting this admin off hook - far from it.
-
-
Replying to @DavidMDrucker @Hesiod2k11
So what was the policy response that would have ensured Assad never again used CW?
5 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @speechboy71 @Hesiod2k11
Military force, most likely. But my argument isn't that Obama didn't use it, it's that he said he would & didn't.
8 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Getting rid of most all of that WMD without further destabilizing the region by using military farce against Assad was a darn good deal.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
That's a different argument. You might be right but that wasn't the point of debate.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
The point of the debate appears to be helping Trump blame Obama for what Trump's administration green-lighted.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
That certainly wasn't my point. My analysis has been very critical of the Trump admin on that front.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Well. short of outright killing Assad, there wasn't Much Obama could have done to stop ~this~ attack from happening. That's MY point.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
That might be case. I'll entertain that. My argument was specific to the red line, which we're twitter argued to death but just to be clear
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Ask yourself this question: Does Assad do this with Hillary Clinton in the White House? I seriously doubt it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
On this we agree.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.