How is this a both sides argument? One candidate won the popular vote, one did not. There's no game: it's a fact.https://twitter.com/DavidMDrucker/status/811620271065071616 …
-
-
Replying to @mattmfm
One side claims 'if popular vote.' Other side claims 'if you don't count CA..." Everyone is playing.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DavidMDrucker
This is the very problem: equating 'debate the merits of Electoral College' (a legitimate debate!) with a denial of reality.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @mattmfm
... by using selective 'if this, then that' scenarios. But that doesn't mean we can't debate merits of system.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DavidMDrucker @mattmfm
We can't debate the merits of a system when ridiculous "both sides" claims are made to obfuscate reality.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Which reality am I obfuscating?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DavidMDrucker @mattmfm
That the left's argument about the EC as an anachronism has anything to do with "not counting votes"
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
But you make good points. Many disagree w/ me and think you're right on this.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.