This guy really likes me. =>https://twitter.com/davidcmcalpine/status/804021545945341952 …
...Look at top two quotes. Republicans have mixed views. I reported on their various mixed views. That's what they said.
-
-
on the source. And if the reporter's track-record is "iffy" on the topic, the source is all the more important. That THAT 4/
-
Fair enough. I suppose we disagree on my track record. But I just thought it was funny that it was not an all-negative story
-
It wasn't. I only addressed the "who says?" issue. Curious: Do you contend you DID NOT have anti-Trump bias in your writing?
-
That's exactly what I contend. My beat were the anti-Trump Rs, that was my focus. I had colleagues doing Trump covg...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
THAT guy is! Do I CARE what HE says. The Dem I can discard out-of-hand. As you, readers gauge significance of view based 3/
-
Fair points. I stand by reporting. Sources I allow anonymity met my vetting requirements. But you're entitled 2 question.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
particular source obviously wnted anonymity detracts further frm his/her credibility. Readers care abt the source. Deeply. 5/
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
isn't just a playground taunt. We need to know. You name Todd & Conant, but not the "concerned" Repub. I wnt to know who 2/
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Journos & cops are taught "consider the source". It's condescending to thnk readers don't weigh that info too. "Who says?" 1/
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.