Not going too far goes against brand for Trump. It would be more unsettling and odd if he didn't than if he did.https://twitter.com/DavidMDrucker/status/742468826680446976 …
-
-
Replying to @PatrickRuffini
& is Trump's "strong" automatically better play than what HRC offers, even if it's not "weak" per se, just not Trump?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DavidMDrucker
If there's a sense he's better at tapping into a visceral reaction to a terror attack, then he wins
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @PatrickRuffini
In a GOP primary I'd agree to that as given. In a amore diverse Fall electorate, I'm open to it, but want to see data.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DavidMDrucker
Calculus is that in a conventional election, Trump knows he loses. He thinks by throwing everyone off balance he wins.
2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @PatrickRuffini @DavidMDrucker
By being weird and unpredictable, he thinks Clinton may botch the response. This is the idea. Still low odds of success tho.
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like
Trump said it all - "I'm not changing." Risks abound for both. I'm cognizant of GOP primary but don't want to over correct
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.