.@DavidMDrucker One would think banning slush funds (Leadership PAC's) would help parties stay true to the ideology their voters share.
-
-
-
@Tom_TJ_Anderson Sounds plausible but I don't think it matters one way or the other. -
@DavidMDrucker it matters more than u know
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
.
@DavidMDrucker No barriers are placed on $ entering parties to influence policy. Ideology has become propaganda to pacify upset masses.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@DavidMDrucker Banning Congressional junkets paid for by cutouts of terror financiers, or Ponzi schemers should be a good thing? Right?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@DavidMDrucker "will of voters" being key point. GOPe will have to reckon with that soon.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@DavidMDrucker Policy and legislative agenda mean more to the $ backing parties than ideology.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.