@DavidMDrucker Any background on why ND (others) wants to send slate of unbound delegates? Seems undemocratic to shut voters completely out.
-
-
Replying to @BaltimoreBlues
@BaltimoreBlues I mean, not sure of exact motivation. But possibly because holding primaries costs $$$ & some parties like to control fate1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DavidMDrucker
@DavidMDrucker Think I heard something abt a dispute btwn RNC/CO GOP. Hard to fathom party elders locking voters out of modern nom process.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BaltimoreBlues
@BaltimoreBlues Don't know. But not being penalized.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DavidMDrucker
@DavidMDrucker Found some rationale here. Would think there would be backlash if more and more states followed. http://blogs.denverpost.com/thespot/2015/08/28/colorado-gop-faces-questions-on-canceled-presidential-vote-at-2016-caucus/122764/ …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@BaltimoreBlues Well, yes, I agree, if more followed. But if only a few every cycle, likely overlooked. Even more so if open conv's are rare
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.