@DavidMDrucker @McCormackJohn Does support for an overall, compromised bill denote support for every component?
-
-
Replying to @ChasFlemming
@DavidMDrucker@McCormackJohn compromise, not compromised.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ChasFlemming
@ChasFlemming@McCormackJohn Voting for a bill means supporting it, even if don't support everything in it; voting against is voting against2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @DavidMDrucker
@DavidMDrucker Then why isn't every Omnibus bill voted down unanimously?@McCormackJohn1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ChasFlemming
@ChasFlemming Should have been clearer. Voting yes doesn't mean you support everything, but politically your opponents can claim you do.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DavidMDrucker
@DavidMDrucker Ah. I thought so, after I re-read. Thanks.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @DavidMDrucker
@DavidMDrucker Where I'm left: If I offer something I don't like as a compromise now, and the offer is rejected, do I have to renounce it?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ChasFlemming
@ChasFlemming No rules. But as matter of politics it's helpful to be clear about where you stand - unless ambiguity is preferred1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DavidMDrucker
@DavidMDrucker Tactical ambiguity? Is that not deception?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@ChasFlemming Could be interpreted that way. Could be viewed leaving political flexibility. Subjective, voters end up deciding what it is
-
-
Replying to @DavidMDrucker
@DavidMDrucker Rubio's people and many Rubio-sympathetic commentators accuse Cruz of flat-out lying. Either then or now.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ChasFlemming
@ChasFlemming All campaigns make the most extreme arguments. Helps drive. Standard strategy.0 replies 1 retweet 0 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.