"Understandable if you walk away thinking", is just so lame. Cruz does not say that, & asserting wrongly is wrong.https://twitter.com/davidmdrucker/status/677828554097340416 …
@IshYimini @tedcruz What am I missing in this interview? I read it and listened to it again several times yesterday. It's ambiguous.
-
-
@DavidMDrucker how does ambiguity equal support ? If anything, he's careful to not explicitly endorse it, seehttps://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2015/12/17/sorry-marco-rubio-ted-cruz-hates-amnesty-a-lot-more-than-you-do/ … -
@IshYimini There's a reason I wrote 'people might think that' vs. 'he endorsed it.' I printed full remarks to be fair. -
@DavidMDrucker but I'm not sure why you'd be interested in cuddling assertions that aren't factual. Especially considering his denials. -
@DavidMDrucker people "might think" lots of things, but usually journalists correct the record rather than excuse the misconception. -
@IshYimini Sometimes the story is that the politician allows people to think a lot of things by not being clear. -
@DavidMDrucker what's very clear is 1) he did not endorse legalization , & 2) he's says so now, that we'd go with the misconception is odd. -
@DavidMDrucker fair to write that Cruz speaks like the lawyer & his words are well crafted. But there's nothing on support of legalization. -
@DavidMDrucker if anything, his repeated mentioning of "the amendment" is evidence that it *wasn't* his immigration stance. - 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.