@DavidMDrucker we dont know there will be a filibusterhttps://twitter.com/philipaklein/status/641268852668678144 …
That @BarackObama won't B forced 2 veto #IranDeal disapproval (apparently) a big victory. Would've been quite politically useful 2 opponents
-
-
-
@philipaklein Reid surely wants to block veto, which is bad for Obama. He'll get it unless 2 Dems defy him. Don't bet on it. -
@philipaklein I read. But he doesn't demand and up or down at 51. He could easily say that Reid offered an up or down at 60 but MM refused
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@DavidMDrucker Not sure. Filibustering "pseudo-treaty" undermines already crumbling legitimacy: http://www.cnn.com/2015/09/08/opinions/hewitt-iran-deal-2016/index.html …#NoBindingEffect - End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@DavidMDrucker McConnell should suspend the rule and bring it to a vote regardless -
@kinxbitz He would have to invoke the nuclear option. Unlikely.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@DavidMDrucker any Senator that filibusters an up or down vote on the Iran Nuclear Deal is actually more exposed. Let them explain it. -
@DavidMDrucker if they truly have 41 votes to block a vote, the GOP should force the Dems to actually filibuster it old school style.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@DavidMDrucker@BarackObama not sure if all yeses on deal will filibuster. UnclearThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.