I firmly disagree with Carson. Yes, there were pre-Obamacare statist problems in health care, but not reason we need a plan b4 repeal
@RMConservative Just playing devils advocate, don't you need replace so people won't just lose plans, etc, & know rules of road post ACA?
-
-
@DavidMDrucker 80% are Medicaid. plus many of the remaining r like myself who were kicked off their original plans.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@DavidMDrucker maybe Carson meant this, but repeal would be paired with immediate insurance surge allowing any type of plan to b offered -
@RMConservative Law would have to be changed for "any kind of plan" 2B offered - that cld constitute "replace" maybe he meant that -
@DavidMDrucker but repealing o-care means not just the honey but the bitter pill of mandates. correct, not all, but at least o-care ones -
@RMConservative You might B right. Were other regs pre-Ocare. & Insurers wld still need time to prepare covg products. Trying 2 figure out -
@DavidMDrucker sure, that's within the margins. but cons are rightfully suspicious that "replace" b4 repeal is really excuse 2 eschew repeal -
@RMConservative Fair point and different issue.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@DavidMDrucker@RMConservative#ACA is in no way a safety net. It's private insurance under government mandates. Repeal eliminates mandates.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.