@DavidMDrucker choosing SC over WA bc WA has a labor cartel that raises costs is night and day different then demanding subsidies to stay
-
-
Replying to @conncarroll
@conncarroll What I'm arguing is that business doesn't distinguish - they have bottom line & look to meet it anyway (legally) possible.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DavidMDrucker
@DavidMDrucker by this logic you are for billionaires holding cities hostage for taxpayer stadiums. there is nothing free market about that2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @conncarroll
@conncarroll Business cares about meeting bottom line, whether through Ex-Im or other means.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DavidMDrucker
@DavidMDrucker you still have in no way differentiated between billionaires who extort stadiums from tax payers and Ex-Im beneficiaries4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @conncarroll
@conncarroll ...Change system & you'll change behavior. You sound no different than a Liberal who criticizes corps for "extorting" workers..2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DavidMDrucker
@DavidMDrucker "You sound no different than a Liberal who criticizes corps for "extorting" workers.." This is ignorant.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @conncarroll
@conncarroll We agree on some stuff & disagree on others. To be clear my point was not to argue for Ex-Im, just to explain biz behavior1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DavidMDrucker
@DavidMDrucker no. by excusing Ex-Im rent seeking as "business" you are enabling it.2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @conncarroll
@DavidMDrucker the only way to get billionaires to stop robbing taxpayers through stadiums and Ex-Im subsidies is to shame them1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes
@conncarroll Will never work & missed point about their view of tax/regulatory burden that causes "rent-seeking" relief in first place
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.